| Mon, Feb 8 2010 10:05am GMT 1 |

Poultry Talk. com Team
389 Posts
|
Should birds which don't meet their required breed
standard be culled to help preserve the pure breeds we
have?
Or be kept for pets?
What are your views on this?
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 03:25pm GMT 2 |

poppydog66
18 Posts
|
Personally I think that as long as they re not used for breeding
stock, keeping them for pets or egg production should nt be a
problem.
Alex
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 07:43pm GMT 3 |

drew.paterson
108 Posts
|
i do try my hardest to give away or sell but if knowone needs or
whant them i do cull, wouldnt cull hens. also if there from good
parents, try breeding from them as they may produce some good
stock
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 08:43pm GMT 4 |

BigBrahma
64 Posts
|
Good
topic.
I breed a good number of birds but could never cull a healthy
bird. I always breed for type but have a real problem with
culling birds of poor type. As an animal lover I could not breed
then kill a bird because it does not meet a type which rarely has
anything to do with health or vitality of the breed (infact in
many cases over time it has had the opposite effect). I always
find pet homes for my birds and have even picked up cheap pullets
so I can pair off cockerels. If I ever get to a point where I
can't rehome cockerels and can't keep them myself I will stop
breeding.
I have no problem with birds being killed if ill or for meat. I
know of individuals that will cull over 10birds for every 1 kept
just to meet a standard.
As far as keeping them for pets, some that people feel that all
poultry keepers should breed for type. Although I do, I think it
is important to remember that people keep birds for different
reasons. If someone wants to breed poultry and does not want to
worry about type that is fine, as long as any birds sold are
advertised as pet quality. Providing birds are kept
appropriately, birds bred without regard to type are likely over
generations to be more healthy.
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 08:51pm GMT 5 |

poppydog66
18 Posts
|
Got to agree with you BigBrahma, I could nt kill a healthy bird
just because it wasnt up to breed standard, its bad enough when
they die of natural causes. Well done for finding them homes or
girlfriends lol!
I keep all my chickens purely for pleasure, hopefully we ll have a
few crossbred chicks (we have a marran cockerel and warren hens) in
the spring once I get hold of an incubator!
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 09:15pm GMT 6 |

BigBrahma
64 Posts
|
Great, I would love to see some pics later in the year.
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 09:37pm GMT 7 |

poppydog66
18 Posts
|
I ll keep you posted, hopefully we should get some interesting
colours going on, but as long as they have a good temperament like
the warrens do I ll be a happy girl!
|
|
| Mon, Feb 8 2010 10:00pm GMT 8 |

chaz
9 Posts
|
I breed for fun but like to breed to the breed standard, instead of
culling hard like some breeders I select carefully, keeping a few
and selling on the rest. I keep a few boys for eating as
well.
I don't have a problem with culling if ill or for meat but I know
someone who bred 100's of seramas and culled 100's! such a waste as
they'd make fab pets for someone!
|
|
| Fri, Feb 12 2010 11:04pm GMT 9 |

archiesgems
30 Posts
|
we now breed alot of araucana's and could sell on twice as many as
we hatch, most people who buy the birds want some 'back garden'
hens to lay them eggs and be a good focal point or a pet (a lot of
them don't realise just how addictive chickens become!!)
out of all of the birds we hatched last year i culled 6,
If they don't meet the 'standards' it does'nt mean that they have
to die! it just means that they can't be shown.
you can keep a bird 'pure' without having all of the standards set
for it, the purity is in the genes not the looks.
my wife doesn't look like Naomi Cambell (she's a so called show
standard!!!) but she wasn't culled because of it!
|
|
| Sat, Feb 13 2010 04:03pm GMT 10 |

chaz
9 Posts
|
haha that made me laugh so true though!
I think its a shame that breeding for show is more often then not
making the breeds weaker. for example I have two pekins (one black
and one mottled) from a top show strain, they are weak and don't
think either have laid yet (well over a year old!), whereas I have
a pair of pure mottled pekins of a more garden/ pet quality that I
bought because of being over mottled and tiny to put to show ones
and the difference in vigor is amazing! the pet ones are bright red
in the face with much healthier looking plumage and more energetic
foraging and jumping around more. Not to mention she started laying
at 6 months. They are both kept in the same pen with the same feed
etc...
All these people who are culling due to "imperfection" are also
often culling out the health of some breeds too!
|
|
| Sun, Feb 14 2010 10:35am GMT 11 |

Tweedy
11 Posts
|
Very true chaz, ive bought so called show stock in the past and
ended up with hens that dont lay and cockerels just not interested
in treading. Yet mr ugly in the next pen is at it 24/7 if i let him
lol.
|
|
| Tue, Aug 17 2010 06:42am BST 12 |

Momma Hen
51 Posts
|
As long as they are healthy i could never cull a bird! But why cull
a bird before you find out what it produces when breeding it! I
personally would find a good home for the bird and if they want to
breed it let them hash out all the little details. Some birds that
don't meet breed standard may actually produce a very unique/
beautiful addition to the breed.
|
|
| Sun, Aug 22 2010 02:13pm BST 13 |

Ginny
30 Posts
|
I wanted to get some Lincolnshire Buffs. I was so desperate i got
hold of some eggs and after a long story got 3 chicks. They all had
curled toes. Should I have culled them. I didn't have the guts. So
I tried to straiten their toes. It worked on 1. 1 still has curled
toes but not as bad and the third has now got 1 leg facing
backwards. I still can't kill it and it is managing to get about,
eat and drink. Am I being cruel and selfish?
|
|